Special

Forum - Fact Checking websites

Overview > InfoCheckers contents creation > Article Topics > Fact Checking websites Write a reply
[#21]
avatar

This is the spin-off from Talk:Fact_Checking_websites: free discussion of Fact Checking websites. Anyone can add comments which will be open for discussion.

Please note: The administrator and thread supervisor reserve the right to delete any post that is deemed inappropriate. Inappropriate posts are for example spam, violating webiquette. Also far off-topic posts risk deletion or at least moving.

Posted by Admin (administrator) on 8 May 2019 at 10:42.
avatar

Snopes: "In March 2019, we asked Twitter about anti-Muslim hate speech on the platform following the mass shooting in Christchurch, New Zealand in which a white supremacist has been accused of killing 50 people in a shooting rampage at two mosques. "

- That question is almost certainly inaccurate as he is according to himself (and consistent with his explanations) not a supremacist. He's a racist and fighting to protect his culture. Snopes looks superficial to me, and with an outspoken left bias.

So, Snopes seems to be not so reliable, even according to Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/kalevleetaru/2016/12/22/the-daily-mail-snopes-story-and-fact-checking-the-fact-checkers

Posted by Tim88 on 8 May 2019 at 12:34.
Edited by Tim88 on 8 May 2019 at 12:35.

To protect the wiki against automated spamming, we kindly ask you to solve the following task below and enter the answer in the box (more info):