Difference between revisions of "InfoCheckers"
From InfoCheckers
(added news item) |
(Douma Syria attack) |
||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
-------------------------------- | -------------------------------- | ||
− | '''Not In The News''' (but should have been | + | '''Not In The News''' (but should have been?): |
+ | |||
+ | Courage Foundation panel criticizes ‘Unacceptable Practices’ in the OPCW’s investigation of the Alleged Chemical Attack in Douma, Syria on April 7th 2018. 'Key information about chemical analyses, toxicology consultations, ballistics studies, and witness testimonies was suppressed, ostensibly to favor a preordained conclusion.'<br> | ||
+ | - https://couragefound.org/2019/10/analytical-points-opcw-panel<br> | ||
500 scientists signed letter to UN on climate change, claiming 'no climate emergency'<br> | 500 scientists signed letter to UN on climate change, claiming 'no climate emergency'<br> | ||
Line 38: | Line 41: | ||
- https://www.studentnewsdaily.com/example-of-media-bias/500-experts-sign-letter-to-un-on-climate-change/ | - https://www.studentnewsdaily.com/example-of-media-bias/500-experts-sign-letter-to-un-on-climate-change/ | ||
− | Studies funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation expect human-induced global warming to tail off slightly over the next few decades. A weaker sun could reduce temperatures by half a degree.<br> | + | 'Studies funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation expect human-induced global warming to tail off slightly over the next few decades. A weaker sun could reduce temperatures by half a degree.'<br> |
- http://www.snf.ch/en/researchinFocus/newsroom/Pages/news-170327-press-release-suns-impact-on-climate-change-quantified-for-first-time.aspx | - http://www.snf.ch/en/researchinFocus/newsroom/Pages/news-170327-press-release-suns-impact-on-climate-change-quantified-for-first-time.aspx | ||
Revision as of 20:44, 8 November 2019
Wiki topics . . . . Forum topics . . . . Blog topics
Nowadays we have access to an overdose of information and it's not possible for a single individual to sort out all honest information from disinformation and propaganda.
Search engines serve links to Wikipedia articles near the top of their results, but some of those articles are extremely unreliable. And when one looks for better information, the choice is often between two extremes: more unquestioned "mainstream" dogma or "alternative" sites of doubtful reliability.
This new website is meant to serve as a tool for a community of people who want to be well informed. We can achieve much more together while spending less time individually.
- The focus is our own research-based wiki, correcting selected Wikipedia articles. Planned categories:
- Fact Checking websites - existing fact checking sites (started already)
- Current affairs - debated topics that are in the news
- Society - still relevant topics that have been in the news (or should have been)
- Environment - air pollution, pesticides etc.
- Health - medicine, alternative medicine, food supplements etc.
- Science - history of science, relativity, quantum mechanics etc.
- (Proposals for topics here) Count: 24 pages
- (Proposals for topics here)
- With our own discussion forum (discussions started)
- With a blog (started February 2019). Recent blog posts:
- Sea level rise and NASA
- Climate: "Deniers" and "Believers"
- Bill Browder and the European Court of Human Rights (Magnitsky myth exploded!)
As discussed in Project:Organization and operation, we will introduce a new method to arrive at a reasonably objective and fair presentation of facts in our Wiki articles.
Not In The News (but should have been?):
Courage Foundation panel criticizes ‘Unacceptable Practices’ in the OPCW’s investigation of the Alleged Chemical Attack in Douma, Syria on April 7th 2018. 'Key information about chemical analyses, toxicology consultations, ballistics studies, and witness testimonies was suppressed, ostensibly to favor a preordained conclusion.'
- https://couragefound.org/2019/10/analytical-points-opcw-panel
500 scientists signed letter to UN on climate change, claiming 'no climate emergency'
- https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/no-climate-emergency-say-500-scientists-reports-physicians-for-civil-defense-300939058.html
- https://www.studentnewsdaily.com/example-of-media-bias/500-experts-sign-letter-to-un-on-climate-change/
'Studies funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation expect human-induced global warming to tail off slightly over the next few decades. A weaker sun could reduce temperatures by half a degree.'
- http://www.snf.ch/en/researchinFocus/newsroom/Pages/news-170327-press-release-suns-impact-on-climate-change-quantified-for-first-time.aspx
This Intro page is open for comments
Short manual here
Blogs may contain Vimeo videos with their own Vimeo cookies only (no trackers).