Difference between revisions of "Fact Checking websites"

From InfoCheckers

(+ climate)
(Added Reuters Fact Check)
 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
'''Overview'''
 
'''Overview'''
  
Here under some links to fact checking sites of reasonable quality (the first two seem to be great investigative journalism sites with an opposite bias).
+
Here under some links to '''fact checking sites of reasonable quality''' (the first two seem to be great investigative journalism sites with an opposite bias).
  
 
[http://21stcenturywire.com/about/ 21stcenturywire]
 
[http://21stcenturywire.com/about/ 21stcenturywire]
Line 24: Line 24:
  
 
[https://www.truthorfiction.com/ Truth or Fiction]
 
[https://www.truthorfiction.com/ Truth or Fiction]
 +
 +
[https://thegrayzone.com/ The Grayzone] - see also [https://thegrayzone.com/2020/06/10/wikipedia-formally-censors-the-grayzone-as-regime-change-advocates-monopolize-editing/#more-24867 here]
 +
 +
[https://www.reuters.com/fact-check Reuters Fact Check] - see for a bad experience [[Blog:US_2020_elections:_evidence_of_fraud|this blog post]] - black listing candidate! (see hereunder).
  
 
More to come later (you may add some!). Here a couple more, related to Global warming:
 
More to come later (you may add some!). Here a couple more, related to Global warming:
  
https://wattsupwiththat.com
+
https://wattsupwiththat.com Generally fair climate science criticism with open discussion <br>
https://wottsupwiththat.com
+
https://wottsupwiththat.com<br>
https://skepticalscience.com/
+
https://skepticalscience.com/ (critical review on competing(?) site: [http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/03/truth-about-skeptical-science.html  "truth about skepticalscience"])<br>
 +
https://friendsofscience.org/ (critical note: their [https://friendsofscience.org/index.php?id=1 declared opinion] creates an auto-bias going forward)<br>
 +
https://www.therightclimatestuff.com/trcs-reports.html
 +
 
 +
related to fact checking: https://junkscience.com
 +
 
 +
In time we should do some '''ranking''', with the more reliable ones higher up.
 +
 
 +
An very primitive ranking will now be introduced by starting hereunder:<br>
 +
'''Blacklist''' of '''unreliable or extremely biased''' fact check sites
  
In time we should do some '''ranking'''.
+
[https://apnews.com/hub/ap-fact-check AP Fact Check]
  
 
It should be noted that Wikipedia also has a list of fact checking sites: <BR>
 
It should be noted that Wikipedia also has a list of fact checking sites: <BR>

Latest revision as of 19:24, 13 April 2021

Overview

Here under some links to fact checking sites of reasonable quality (the first two seem to be great investigative journalism sites with an opposite bias).

21stcenturywire

Bellingcat

the Intercept

Truth in Media

Zero Hedge

the Duran

Global Research

Newsbud

Snopes

TruthInMedia

Truth or Fiction

The Grayzone - see also here

Reuters Fact Check - see for a bad experience this blog post - black listing candidate! (see hereunder).

More to come later (you may add some!). Here a couple more, related to Global warming:

https://wattsupwiththat.com Generally fair climate science criticism with open discussion
https://wottsupwiththat.com
https://skepticalscience.com/ (critical review on competing(?) site: "truth about skepticalscience")
https://friendsofscience.org/ (critical note: their declared opinion creates an auto-bias going forward)
https://www.therightclimatestuff.com/trcs-reports.html

related to fact checking: https://junkscience.com

In time we should do some ranking, with the more reliable ones higher up.

An very primitive ranking will now be introduced by starting hereunder:
Blacklist of unreliable or extremely biased fact check sites

AP Fact Check

It should be noted that Wikipedia also has a list of fact checking sites:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites


Free discussion here: Special:WikiForum/Fact_Checking_websites