Difference between revisions of "Fact Checking websites"
From InfoCheckers
(+ climate) |
(Added Reuters Fact Check) |
||
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Overview''' | '''Overview''' | ||
− | Here under some links to fact checking sites of reasonable quality (the first two seem to be great investigative journalism sites with an opposite bias). | + | Here under some links to '''fact checking sites of reasonable quality''' (the first two seem to be great investigative journalism sites with an opposite bias). |
[http://21stcenturywire.com/about/ 21stcenturywire] | [http://21stcenturywire.com/about/ 21stcenturywire] | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
[https://www.truthorfiction.com/ Truth or Fiction] | [https://www.truthorfiction.com/ Truth or Fiction] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [https://thegrayzone.com/ The Grayzone] - see also [https://thegrayzone.com/2020/06/10/wikipedia-formally-censors-the-grayzone-as-regime-change-advocates-monopolize-editing/#more-24867 here] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [https://www.reuters.com/fact-check Reuters Fact Check] - see for a bad experience [[Blog:US_2020_elections:_evidence_of_fraud|this blog post]] - black listing candidate! (see hereunder). | ||
More to come later (you may add some!). Here a couple more, related to Global warming: | More to come later (you may add some!). Here a couple more, related to Global warming: | ||
− | https://wattsupwiththat.com | + | https://wattsupwiththat.com Generally fair climate science criticism with open discussion <br> |
− | https://wottsupwiththat.com | + | https://wottsupwiththat.com<br> |
− | https://skepticalscience.com/ | + | https://skepticalscience.com/ (critical review on competing(?) site: [http://www.populartechnology.net/2012/03/truth-about-skeptical-science.html "truth about skepticalscience"])<br> |
+ | https://friendsofscience.org/ (critical note: their [https://friendsofscience.org/index.php?id=1 declared opinion] creates an auto-bias going forward)<br> | ||
+ | https://www.therightclimatestuff.com/trcs-reports.html | ||
+ | |||
+ | related to fact checking: https://junkscience.com | ||
+ | |||
+ | In time we should do some '''ranking''', with the more reliable ones higher up. | ||
+ | |||
+ | An very primitive ranking will now be introduced by starting hereunder:<br> | ||
+ | '''Blacklist''' of '''unreliable or extremely biased''' fact check sites | ||
− | + | [https://apnews.com/hub/ap-fact-check AP Fact Check] | |
It should be noted that Wikipedia also has a list of fact checking sites: <BR> | It should be noted that Wikipedia also has a list of fact checking sites: <BR> |
Latest revision as of 19:24, 13 April 2021
Overview
Here under some links to fact checking sites of reasonable quality (the first two seem to be great investigative journalism sites with an opposite bias).
The Grayzone - see also here
Reuters Fact Check - see for a bad experience this blog post - black listing candidate! (see hereunder).
More to come later (you may add some!). Here a couple more, related to Global warming:
https://wattsupwiththat.com Generally fair climate science criticism with open discussion
https://wottsupwiththat.com
https://skepticalscience.com/ (critical review on competing(?) site: "truth about skepticalscience")
https://friendsofscience.org/ (critical note: their declared opinion creates an auto-bias going forward)
https://www.therightclimatestuff.com/trcs-reports.html
related to fact checking: https://junkscience.com
In time we should do some ranking, with the more reliable ones higher up.
An very primitive ranking will now be introduced by starting hereunder:
Blacklist of unreliable or extremely biased fact check sites
It should be noted that Wikipedia also has a list of fact checking sites:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_fact-checking_websites
Free discussion here: Special:WikiForum/Fact_Checking_websites